Sunday, 24 June 2012

How did Elizabeth’s personal values affect her actions during her reign and how did this bring about change in England?

Elizabeth’s personal values shaped the legislation she introduced to the church at the start of her reign from November 17 1558.
- The Church of England, as it emerged under Elizabeth, was an expression of her views- moderate, conservative, and tolerant.

- Elizabeth’s personal religion was a simple, rational belief that did not go to either Catholic of Protestant extremes. Because she was neither a strong Catholic, nor a strong Protestant, she implemented religious changes that allowed both religions to be worshipped.

- One of Elizabeth’s main goals was to unite England through religion, so made church attendance compulsory under the Act of Uniformity introduced in 1559. Elizabeth’s desire was, in the words of the Lord Keeper, Sir Nicholas Bacon, “to secure and unite the people of the realm in one uniform order to the glory of God and to general tranquillity”.

- Act of Uniformity was intended to make church services the same throughout the country, as Elizabeth wished to see her people join together as one.

- Elizabeth strived for peace and harmony within her nation. Through introducing legislation that appealed to both Catholic and Puritans, she limited the amount of rebellion from either. This allowed stability in the church.

- Conformity and obedience were two qualities that Elizabeth regarded highly important in a person. She used her instatement of the  ‘Act of Uniformity’ and the ‘Act of Supremacy’ in 1559 as tools to drill these values into the English people.

- Elizabeth held the values of a true Erastian, someone who believed in government of the Church and State by one person, the monarch. This means that religion and politics went hand-in-hand to Elizabeth. This can be seen through her Act of Supremacy in 1559, where those holding church or government official positions, were required to swear complete loyalty to the Queen.

- Elizabeth appointed a new Archbishop of Canterbury, Matthew Parker, to impose order on the people. This way her wish to run a structured church of England was made possible.

- Elizabeth exclaimed, “there is only one Christ, Jesus, one faith. All else is a dispute over trifles”. She developed religious laws around her belief that Catholics and Protestants were both part of the same faith. 
The Act of Supremacy was one way in which Elizabeth guaranteed support from her people. This helped her to consolidate her monarchy. 

- The Act of Supremacy passed in 1559 required all church and government officials to swear, hand on bible, absolute loyalty to Elizabeth as Supreme Governor of the Church.



- Those who refused to take the oath were deprived of their offices, although most accepted the settlement, showing that she had support behind her from the start of her reign. The threat of taking away offices from those who refused encouraged the people to be loyal to her.



- Oath of Supremacy stated, “that the Queen’s Highness is the only supreme governor of this realm”. This ensures that her people will follow her and no one else.



- Oath also stated, “do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the Queen’s Highness, her heirs and lawful successors”.



- By making churchmen and royal officials take this oath, other members of society would be encouraged to take on the same belief, as they were the role models in society.



- Elizabeth used her position as supreme governor of the Church to strengthen her position as head of state. By introducing the Act of Supremacy Elizabeth strengthened her support system across England, as people were forced to abide by her beliefs.

- The Act put Elizabeth in control, pleasing the Protestants. She also dropped the Pope’s title, ‘Supreme Head’, offering some consolation to the Catholics. This allowed her bishops to still deal with matters of religious doctrine, although she still compelled her bishops to adopt her beliefs. The Act of Supremacy was clever in the way in that even though she gave the bishops some control, the new legislation meant that everyone had to abide to her authority over the church.

- ‘Out of 9400 clergy in England only 192 refused the oath of supremacy’. 

The religious changes Elizabeth introduced were a lot more liberal than the laws enforced by Queen Mary. This allowed room for people to still hold their own beliefs.
- Elizabeth reissued a second Edwardian prayer book, altering it so that it appealed to both Catholic’s and Protestants. This meant that there was not as a strict influence on one religion, as in Mary’s time, who only tolerated those of Catholic faith.

- Mary Tudor was known as ‘Bloody Mary’, for her hobby for executing Protestants. She executed 287 Protestants during her reign and even tried to execute Elizabeth when she fell ill and learnt that her half-sister was next in line to the throne. Elizabeth did not embody such discrimination against either religion, allowing room for people to incorporate aspects of both religions into their worship.

- As long as people conformed outwardly, they could believe in the Protestant Church as much as they wanted to. Elizabeth came close to saying that a different form of worship was not necessarily evil, showing that she was more accepting of other faiths than Mary and other rulers in Europe. She was open-minded and set fewer restrictions on religion, acknowledging that people might still be good Christians although their beliefs differed slightly from those of their neighbours.

- The English Bible had been banned by Mary, but Elizabeth permitted it, not only in churches, but in homes too.

- Rowse wrote that the Elizabeth Settlement provided “the maximum amount of unity for the English people that could be combined with probably the greatest amount of liberty of opinion that was possible under the circumstances”. This permitted a range of beliefs and greater freedom for people to think and believe for themselves.

- Rather than adhering to Mary’s policy of burning many heretics at the stake, Elizabeth aimed to create an ecclesiastical polity that was inclusive.  She wanted the church to be open to all so that she could accommodate for everyone’s desires and therefore gain support and loyalty from them in return. She created a “church for all the people of England”, permitting the Gospel and Epistle to be read in English in mass to keep aspects of the Catholic faith alive amongst the new Protestant ways.

- Introduced aspects to the church that encompassed both Catholic and Protestant traditions to appeal to both faiths. The church in its prayers, feasts and liturgy maintained the old Catholic calendar, but its 39 articles were Protestant.

- Catholicism found it could survive, under the Protestant dispensation of the Elizabethan Church.

- Due to her determination the Church of England remained sufficiently flexible and moderate. Elizabethan parishioners could take communion standing, sitting or kneeling, depending on the preferences of the community and its minister.

- Elizabeth left room in her legislation for Catholics to still hold their own religion discreetly as long as they were openly loyal to her. This was both tactful and essential to developing her monarchy and a strong support system. Alienating Catholicism was not the answer to maintaining her goal of peace throughout the nation.  

Several positive outcomes resulted from Elizabeth’s constant refusal to marry or name a successor.
- Although members of parliament and the Privy Council continuously encouraged Elizabeth to marry and name a successor, Elizabeth was adamant that she would be doing no such thing.

- In 1559 Elizabeth told the House of Commons, “I will be Queen of England so long as I live; after my death let them succeed to whom in right it shall appertain if that be your Queen”.



- Her one love would be for her country, there was no room for another, “I have already joined myself in marriage to a husband, namely the kingdom of England”. This showed her dedication to her country and proved that she had no intention on transferring this love into a man. She would be forever focused and devoted to England and her people.



- She was able to remain at the centre of the government and focus entirely on the well being of her nation.



- Showed people that a woman was more than capable of successfully ruling a nation without a man by her side. This filled people with a new appreciation for women and hope that women would one day be seen as equals to men. Women were inspired by her strength and saw her as a role model.


- An image of the Virgin Queen was created, encouraging patriotism and loyalty to England. Strategically aligning herself with the catholic figure the Virgin Mary, Elizabeth secured a shift of power through her embodiment of symbolic virginity.


France was not in favour of the religious changes Elizabeth set in place. However, she used this antipathy as a tool to strengthen her authority.
- France was in favour of Mary Queen of Scots, as wished to see England return to a Catholic state.


- France stated that Mary Queen of Scots was the rightful Queen of England. 




- Elizabeth had a success against the French when they announced their intention to help the Scots defeat the revolt of the Lords of the Congregation. This painted Elizabeth in a positive light, as it showed the strength of her power from the very start of her reign.


- Because of France’s intervention in Scotland, Elizabeth had the chance to draw up the Treaty of Edinburgh on July 6th 1560, declaring that all French and English troops would retreat from Scotland and that Mary would renounce her title of England. In the end the interference of the French only helped Elizabeth in her attempts to keep Mary at bay. Mary relied on French support, so by cutting off the twos connections, Mary was greatly weakened, but Elizabeth grew stronger.

- Treaty meant that all men of war were removed from Scotland, drastically decreasing the accessibility of French assistance to Mary. It stated that no troops were to be sent from France to England, Scotland or Ireland, securing Elizabeth’s crown as none of the above were permitted to attack England. It also ensured that Mary did not have the right to use the coat of arms or title of England. This was to be Elizabeth’s right only. This strengthened Elizabeth’s authority. 

- Elizabeth used the inner turmoil in France to re-introduce an English presence there, but was unsuccessful.

- In 1564 a new regent in France was appointed, Catherine de Medici, who was not supportive of Mary’s cause, benefiting Elizabeth.   


Elizabeth’s decision to execute Mary Queen of Scots in 1587 was necessary to safeguard her crown and her country from a Catholic overthrow.
- People lived in fear that Mary Queen of Scots would replace Elizabeth, as she had the best claim to the English throne should Elizabeth die. Several plots were formed by Mary and her supporters to assassinate Elizabeth. If Mary were to wear the crown, she would undoubtedly return England to the Catholic faith. Her execution was the only way to prevent this from happening, to secure Elizabeth’s safety so she could keep building her monarchy.

- Mary had known of several plots to assassinate Elizabeth to place Mary on the throne. She even had people personally offer to do it for her, like Anthony Babington who also offered to kill 6 of Elizabeth’s associates. She gave her blessing to him go forward with the plot. With schemes like theses constantly being brewed, Elizabeth was not safe. Babington Plot of 1586.

- Mary was sure that a collection of Elizabeth’s council members would join her in the event of a counter-revolution. If this were to happen it would mean that Elizabeth would lose support from those closest to her. If Mary had gotten to council members, they may well have encouraged others to go against Elizabeth too. Elizabeth was looking to expand her support base, not decrease it.

- When Elizabeth announced the execution of Mary, celebration broke out all over England. This proves that Mary’s death increased Elizabeth’s fan-base and people were ecstatic about her decision to execute the woman who brought great threat to their nation.

- It was a clever move by Elizabeth to finally agree to Mary’s execution. It eased the country’s trepidation of a Catholic takeover and assassination of their Queen.

- There was a collection of people that were prepared to take extreme measures against Elizabeth to promote Mary to Queen of England. However, if Mary were no longer around, such action would not be needed to be taken (at least not for the same reasons). Mary’s execution gave Elizabeth an opportunity to reach out to those uncertain of her and perhaps win over their approval without Mary standing as an obstacle between them and pushing people away from Elizabeth.

- Mary driving force behind internal Catholic opposition. Rodolfi Plot of 1571 against Elizabeth’s life was linked back to Mary.

- Mary had a strong connection with the Roman Catholic Church and by ending Mary, this connection the Pope had with England would be weakened.

- In 1571 Charles IX said of Mary, “the poor fool will never cease until she lose her head”.

- Mary sent letters out to people in the hope of gaining their support, and in doing so, turning them against Elizabeth. If she had not been executed, Mary would have only built up her followers and Elizabeth would lose many in favour of Mary.

- Elizabeth’s ministers were desperate to execute Mary, which caused much internal conflict between Elizabeth and her royal advisors. When she finally signed the death warrant, her council were extremely happy with her, strengthening Elizabeth’s relationship with her council.

- In a letter from Elizabeth to Mary in October 1586, Elizabeth tells her cousin that she couldn’t possibly let her bring the English “kingdom to destruction by bloodshed”. She had to protect herself and her people. Mary’s death was completely justifiable and vital for Elizabeth to be able to move forward and consolidate her monarchy. 
The Spanish Amada gave Elizabeth the opportunity to highlight her prominent qualities as a leader.

- Due to England’s involvements in the Netherlands in 1585 and then the execution of Mary Queen of Scots in 1587, King Philip II of Spain was not in favour of Elizabeth. This antipathy led Philip II to send an Armada to England in 1588. However, this was all in Elizabeth’s favour. She led a great victory against the Armada, winning over the hearts of her people and strengthening her relationship with them.



- Elizabeth’s famous speech at Tilbury in preparation for battle, stirred national pride and confidence within the English people, proving that she was a capable, determined, loyal queen.



- Through the Armada Elizabeth was able to relate to her people and show her qualities of empathy as she understand England’s fears. “Spain is our mortal enemy and must be resisted”. This empathy was important for creating a trusting relationship between England and Elizabeth.


- “Signal fires must be laid upon the hilltops and made ready for lighting when the Armada is sighted”. This quote from Elizabeth represents her initiative and involvement in the takedown of the Armada. Her people were able to see her in a positive way through showing tremendous leadership skills, delegation and intelligence.

- Through the Armada Elizabeth was able to capture the hearts and imaginations of her people.

- Elizabeth proved that she was incredibly courageous (important quality for a leader), when she rode among thousands of her men towards the Armada.

- Quotes from her famous speech at Tilbury in 1588:
“I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people”.
“I am come… to live and die amongst you all”.
“I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too”.
“I myself will be your general, judge, and rewarder of every one of your virtues in the field”.
“We shall shortly have a famous victory over those enemies of my God, of my kingdom, and of my people”.
This speech shows that she trusts and respects her people. She is loyal and dedicated to them and wants them to see her as a friend, a companion. She provides England with hope and determination to take down the Spanish, motivating them to fight until the very end and be proud of themselves. A good leader wants the best for their people and for them to be happy. Elizabeth epitomizes this in this speech. It allowed her to share a sacred moment with her people.

- The victory of the Armada restored confidence and hope in many aspects of English society. Industries blossomed all over England and the people branched out to explore how far life could really take them. For this, they had Elizabeth to thank. She had inspired them and lead the way to a more fulfilling life.

- The English defeat of the Armada was due to the time and effort Elizabeth put into safe guarding her people. She had authorized sufficient funds to maintain a fleet of her own, showing that she was intelligent and could be depended on to protect England. She showed initiative. 

- England was blown away by Elizabeth’s defeat of the Spanish. They looked up to what they believed to be an extraordinary woman. The Armada painted Elizabeth in an inspiration and courageous light, making her a leader deserving great admiration.

- After the Armada the English called Elizabeth, “Gloriana” and the “Faery Queen” saying that she was their “God on earth”. She developed immense respect from her people, an important virtue for a leader to hold. 
Elizabeth’s personal desire to rule lead to her keeping a tight rein on parliament.
- Elizabeth preferred short sessions, as Parliaments often put her on the defence. Her replies were normally vague and she closed Parliament before the MPs could disagree with her decisions.

- She could it infrequently, only when it was desperately needed. It only met thirteen times during her 45-year reign. She would only call it to approve taxes, as they could only be collected if Parliament agreed to them, to help pass ‘Acts of Parliament’ and to provide her with support and advice.

- She kept strict control over what her MPs were allowed to talk about. Certain issues like Elizabeth’s personal affairs, religion or policy, were not to be discussed. Angered Elizabeth when they mentioned these subjects and, like in 1566, 1571, 1584, 1589. She regarded many subjects of national importance as prerogative matters.

- Made sure that several of her Privy Councillors sat in the House of Lords or were elected to the Commons, so that they could help her win support for government measures.

- “Parliament was a most useful means of applying pressure on the Queen to accept policies she disliked”. Elizabeth knew this, hence her decision to call parliament infrequently so she would not be put in such a position. 

Here is a link to the podcast I have made about this topic:
http://soundcloud.com/kate-shorter-1/audio-recording-on-wednesday-1